Отзывы о Highland Park Triskelion расходятся: часть дегустаторов хвалит баланс и сложность, часть считает его слабым и переоценённым по цене. Общего консенсуса по вкусу в текстах не заявлено.
развернуть подробно
В текстовых отзывах Triskelion описывается по-разному. Несколько авторов отмечают дымный/торфяной фон в сочетании с фруктовыми и сладкими нотами: один из отзывов упоминает лёгкую дымность, морские и минеральные ноты, цитрус, шерри и дуб, а позже изюм, специи, тёмный шоколад и апельсин; ещё один отзыв говорит о сладости, свежих травах и тяжёлом дымном подтоне, а во вкусе — специи, апельсин, изюм, абрикос и слегка кремовую ваниль; другой отзыв описывает сладкую ваниль, карамель, свежие травы, лёгкие фрукты и тесто для печенья с тяжёлым дымом на фоне. Один из отзывов выделяет яблочное пюре, орехи, корицу, акациевый мёд, курагу, ирис, шоколад, финики, сливы и старое дерево в носу, а во вкусе — маслянистость, кремовость, ореховость, табак, шерри и лакрицу. Ещё один отзыв перечисляет мёд оркнейского вереска, ваниль, карамель, ириски, карамелизованные яблоки, персики, ананасы, апельсин, сливы, ячмень, корицу и имбирь. Другой отзыв отмечает апельсин, абрикос, смородину, изюм, мёд и травы, а также длинный пряный финиш с долгим дымом. Один из отзывов говорит о цветочной ноте, сладости, табачной ноте HP, орехах, персике/абрикосе, ванили и бисквите. Ещё один отзыв описывает апельсиновую корку, тонкий торф, мягкие шерри-ноты и дубовую специю, называя это «хорошо сбалансированным».
В то же время ряд отзывов критичен. Другой отзыв хвалит нос (абрикос, яблоко, шерри-орех, мёд, ваниль, цветочные ноты), но называет вкус «ужасно bland» и «водянистым», а финиш — скучным. Один из отзывов считает аромат сбалансированным, но «слабым», «произвольным» и «взаимозаменяемым», вкус — сложным, но не запоминающимся, финиш — недостаточно длинным, и заключает, что при цене около €170–190 виски явно слишком дорог. Ещё один отзыв прямо называет релиз «typical example of a marketing trap» и говорит, что вкус и аромат «poor». Другой отзыв пишет: «Pretty disappointing like a lot of NAS nowadays». Один из отзывов отмечает, что начало было многообещающим, но затем ожидания не оправдались, и ставит 84. Ещё один отзыв говорит о «too many sharp corners, no roundness» и описывает нос как кислый, с лаком для ногтей. Другой отзыв называет его «easy-drinking dram», но ожидал большего влияния шерри-бочки и считает, что ему нужно время. Один из отзывов отмечает, что дымность ощущается только в послевкусии, а вода раскрывает финиш, но убивает запах и вкус.
По цене и ценности мнения тоже расходятся: несколько отзывов называют его дорогим, ещё несколько отзывов считают цену завышенной, тогда как несколько отзывов оценивают его высоко (90). Таким образом, в текстах видна поляризация: одни подчёркивают баланс, фруктово-сладкие и дымные ноты, другие — водянистость, невыразительность и завышенную цену.
собрано 21/28 текстовых отзывов · полный lossless-снимок WB
· 2026-09-13T00:28:59Z · источник evidence
Lu CiferConnoisseur8829 may 2020 9:38 pm
нос · вкус · финиш
Нос
88
somewhat smoky at first, a hint of maritime, slightly mineral notes, citrus fruits, sherry and oak. A little later more aromatic with raisins, spices, dark chocolate and orange.
Вкус
89
slightly smoky and somewhat spicy, aromas of various woods, sherry, spices, orange. Slightly dark, hints of barrel and espresso notes, hints of perfume, delicately tart with oak. The longer in the glass, the more often tastes, the more aromatic and delicious in taste and perception. Not fat or engaging but coherent.
Финиш
87
Relatively light with some oak, citrus notes, sherry, smoke, orange. Harmonious, soft, slightly sweet and smoky. A different Highland Park, no better or worse, just a little different ...
dram-drinkerConnoisseur9007 feb 2022 9:49 pm
Good level of complexity, really balanced and drinkable - pretty good
нос · вкус · финиш
Нос
90
Apple mash, nuts, hints of cinnamon, some acacia honey, dried apricot, toffee, chocolate, dates, plums, old wood, little citric, some sherry notes - pretty good
Вкус
91
Little punchy, oily, creamy, nutty, good sweetness, more apple mash, toffee, cinnamon, spices, little acacia honey, tobacco, sherry wood, spices, some raisins, hints of leather, little liquorice - very good
LouisvandermeerExpert Senior9017 aug 2023 10:54 pm
The whisky is something special, a lot of flavors are being combined in a excellent way without a dominating taste. It is delicious in a lot of ways, but to like the whisky you have to like the more complex flavors and the smokey undertone.
нос · вкус · финиш
Нос
89
Sweetness, fresh herbs and a heavy undertone of smoke fill your whole nose in a pleasant way.
Вкус
94
The first sip you take is a full mouthful of spice, many flavors gradually diminishing after which the clear notes emerge. These notes are (as indicated on the box) oranges, raisins, sweet apricot with forms of slightly creamy vanilla. The flavors follow each other smoothly, there is a pleasant pace between the flavors without one dominating the other or not being present in the overall picture. The smoky undertone forms a coherent whole, where every sip is a pleasure while you discover new flavors within the whisky.
Финиш
87
A long, warm and fruity finish combine the whole whisky to a great end. The smoke is the undertone of the whisky and forms the cohesive finish.
Slàinte MhathSuper Administrator8406 may 2025 4:57 pm
Quick hit review. No age statement and a hefty price tag - let's see if Triskelion can deliver. On the nose, I get ripe peaches, baked apples and dry coal smoke, rounded off by hints of juniper and peppercorn. Not bad. Zesty citrus fruits, rich oak spices and typical Highland Park peatiness dominate the taste, it is quite aromatic and not very sweet. The slightly dry finish is marked by orange zest, almonds and ash. It started out promising but fell a bit short of expectations afterwards. RATING: 3.5/5.0 stars ≙ 84 pts → ABOVE AVERAGE
ffmdinoConnoisseur—07 oct 2021 9:57 pm
an easy-drinking dram no malt for me, would have expected more influence from the sherry barrel he needs time !!
Stefan666Connoisseur8502 nov 2024 5:25 pm
нос 84 · вкус 86 · финиш 84
WhiskyNotesExpert Senior8714 nov 2019 8:46 am
Good, rather refined Highland Park, striking a much better balance of classic HP notes. Orange peel, subtle peat, gentle sherry notes and oak spice. Three types of casks so a bit for everyone. Pricey though.
BaanaanaabobConnoisseur8724 feb 2022 5:54 pm
chocolate, nuts, marzipan, yellow fruits, cinammon, easy fruity sherry without much complexity
whisky313Specialist—03 oct 2019 7:49 pm
Triskelion is a well-known symbol "in the form of three radially symmetric circular arcs, open spirals, interlaced triangles, knot patterns, human legs or other triple forms." A triskelion or triskele is a motif of a triple spiral exhibiting rotational symmetry. The spiral design can be based on interlocking Archimedean spirals, or represent three bent human legs.
CaskNLeafExpert Senior8322 dec 2019 12:04 pm
Nose: Apricot, apple, sherry-nutty, honey and some vanilla, very pleasant and promising, nice light fruits with floral spring notes, in the background an interesting dark, somewhat mineral, note with a slight acidity I like the nose very much. Really exciting and complex. Taste: Oh no, it falls off in taste. What a water! Oh dear! HP, what's the point? Even though the nose was so fine, the taste is terribly bland. A little honey goes with light spice, nuts and watery forest berry thinning juice. There is a noticeable lack of power in taste. finish: The finish and the aftertaste is actually boring. Warm tap water with minimally diluted whisky taste. Conclusion / points: After the excellent nose, the big disappointment. I don't need it in the glass anymore. 83/100 (without a nose my judgment (for a HP) would be devastating !!)
нос 90 · вкус 80 · финиш 79
2ndSipConnoisseur8331 jul 2020 6:12 pm
an (over) expensive HP that needs a lot of time to unfold - air is good for whisky. Pleasant on the nose, without an ostensibly clearly defined aroma, but very well balanced between sweetness, fruit and sherry tones. But that is precisely why that makes it so "weak" in my eyes, it is "arbitrary", "interchangeable", nothing to be remembered. Quite complex in taste: there is always something new to find; But even here nothing remains in the head in terms of taste. The finish ... well, could be longer. Don't get it wrong: the Triskelion is not bad (especially in the nose and in the taste), but still doesn't knock you off your feet - for around € 170-190, in my opinion, it is clearly too expensive for this whisky. Vlt. are my expectations simply too high in this price segment? What would I be willing to pay right now? In terms of price, * I * would set this malt somewhere between 80 and a maximum of 100 euros. Yes, yes, price increases everywhere, etc., may be yes, but this malt is not worth more in my eyes. Maybe only one master blender should have said what's in there, but three master blenders don't make the whisky three times as good. Sorry HP, my opinion (and that as an HP fan, * shaking your head *). it has to be retested after a certain period of time; currently: 83/100; Post-test: I had originally pushed it to the day form, but the post-test (2 months later) brought practically the same thing: I stay at 83/100 [86 - 82 = good whisky -> get a second bottle? Maybe ... in this case: no, not at this price; @ Highland Park: brings this malt out 100 euros cheaper, then I could think again about the PLV and more points, but so ... boy, boy, what were you thinking?] Tip: get a sample first!
нос · вкус · финиш
Нос
85
initially minimal smoke (typical HP heather character), then a slight sweetness of acacia honey, caramel and vanilla. Something fruity is added, goes in the direction of light fruits / stone fruits; every now and then something fresh and citrus pops up, which tends towards orange. Far in the background, a light sherry character with raisins and red dried fruits. Over time, a floral aroma will appear. Overall very balanced, not a dominant note - but it also seems a bit closed. Post-test: the first grades remain; a good 30 minutes of air to breathe: some brown sugar still arrives in the nose. Apricot aroma also comes through. Eminently fruity.
Вкус
83
Very soft at the start and a creamy-oily mouthfeel sets in (positive for me). There is a slight smoky note. Dark chocolate with cinnamon and some marzipan is also there. A little oak is added - but remains rather discreetly in the background. With the second sip, significantly more fruit (tendency to light-colored fruit, although something sherry-like always flashes) and sweeter. With the third sip, nut flavors come through stronger (for me it goes towards almonds). Follow-up test: I'll stick with my notes - essentially nothing has changed.
Финиш
81
some oak and sherry notes remain in the finish for a medium to long time. The sweetness becomes less, but something earthy / tannic remains on the tongue. More could have come ... What a shame. Follow-up test: nothing new and surprising here either.
KayMeertensConnoisseur8707 jul 2021 1:16 pm
Very typical modern Highland Park. Lots of vanilla biscuits and a decent dose of peat.
нос 87 · вкус 87 · финиш 86
Wolf68Connoisseur8531 jul 2021 9:46 pm
нос 86 · вкус 85 · финиш 85
EnjoyLife89Expert Senior8601 nov 2022 3:39 pm
нос · вкус · финиш
Нос
90
Sweet vanilla, caramel, fresh herbs, light fruit, cookie dough. The smoke is heavy in the background.
Вкус
82
Fruit, sweet again, then some wood, nice spices
Финиш
86
Immediately a nut comes, the smoke gets drier, some campfire. Again and again nut. The spices settle nicely on the palate, but disappear quite quickly.
SeWuWhiskyExpert Senior8718 jun 2020 9:04 pm
Appearance: Rich, golden-yellow Nose: light floral broom note, sweetness, very discreetly typical Highland Park tobacco note, nutty, peach / apricot, hint of vanilla, sponge cake, wonderfully complex Mouthfeel: Relatively mild, somewhat heavy on the tongue Flavor: tobacco / smoke note, light sweetness, oak notes, peach, too bad the floral / fruity note could be stronger Finish: further the oak notes mixed with the light tobacco note and an even more subtle sweetness, then fruity again the peach and some caramel
KapkanConnoisseur8323 sep 2020 7:45 am
Whisky has too many sharp corners, no roundness. Good for thrills.
нос · вкус · финиш
Нос
83
Sour smell. Some nail Polish. A bit of sweetness.
Вкус
83
The taste is sweet with a slight sourness.
Финиш
82
The finish is like a lemon with sugar.
Beaker65Connoisseur8702 jul 2021 3:36 pm
A nice NAS of Highland Park. With this they show that an age is not always necessary, but the price can be called considerable. For much less you already have the beautiful HP 18 yrs
нос · вкус · финиш
Нос
87
Orange, apricot, currants and raisins, honey, herbs. I can't detect the familiar smoke of HP.
Вкус
88
Again orange, apricot, currants and raisins, honey and herbs. Also nuts and berries. The well-known smoke of HP is certainly present in the taste. Yummy!
Финиш
87
The finish is long and spicy. The smoke lasts extremely long. A nice whisky, but oh well, that price.
Dr.NoseConnoisseur—06 apr 2024 5:09 pm
Notes from the Internet.
Ireland_2007Expert Junior8723 nov 2025 11:07 pm
It matches my tasting notes, so from my point of view it's good. However, I can also understand that not everyone agrees, as some notes are only present to a limited extent or due to the price. My own SGP comes in at 543.
нос · вкус · финиш
Нос
88
Initially, lots of honey, sherry, and lemon. Later, floral notes emerge. Overall, quite harmonious. Lots of: honey, lemon, sherry, nutmeg, almond, dried fruit Medium notes: Pepper, vanilla, oak, flowers Less: clove, black tea, leather, anise, toast, lime, peat, malt, seaweed, light smoke, yeast
Medium to long length with good sensation. Not quite as intense according to the tasting notes. Remedy: Flowers, anise, almond Less: malt, black tea, lemon, hay, seaweed
MaplConnoisseur8810 oct 2020 8:06 am
нос 91 · вкус 88 · финиш 86
Nick_Hildebrand_2000Connoisseur8714 aug 2026 4:14 pm
нос 88 · вкус 87 · финиш 87
DionysusConnoisseur7825 aug 2020 8:21 pm
Pretty disippointing like a lot of NAS nowadays.
нос 79 · вкус 77 · финиш 78
greenkaktusMember Senior8328 nov 2021 8:03 pm
It is not very clear why some people rate him highly. The most common NAS release. Not particularly outstanding. Beautiful bottle and box + collab story. The taste and aroma are poor. Considering the price, we immediately understand that we are faced with a typical example of a marketing trap. Don't fall into it!
DutchdramConnoisseur8726 mar 2024 11:37 pm
нос · вкус · финиш
Нос
87
Sweet in the beginning with notes like orkney heather honey complemented by vanilla, caramel and all kinds of toffees. Followed by fruity layers. Such as caramelized apples, peaches and pineapples. But that's not all. Also hints of oranges and plums. A note of sweet barley too. At the end spiciness like cinnamon and ginger.
Вкус
88
Sweetness all over. Like heather honey, vanilla, caramel and chocolate raisins. Talking about... fruitiness fall in with hints like apples and some mango. A lovely floral note of lavendel. Some sweet oak too. And at the end spiced again with hints of cinnamon and tiby bits if nutmeg and cloves.
Финиш
86
Medium-long with hints like vanilla, cinnamon and oak.
rolabobConnoisseur8709 jul 2022 9:12 pm
нос 87 · вкус 88 · финиш 87
Ana ChronistExpert Senior8502 dec 2023 8:50 pm
нос 85 · вкус 85 · финиш 86
DistiLeshaConnoisseur8521 oct 2020 7:45 pm
An interesting release, but the smokiness is felt only on the aftertaste. Water reveals the finish, but kills smell and taste.
Оценки по участникам WB
собранные 86.7среднее по всем сохранённым наблюдениям; WB-рейтинг не заменяется
снимок #1839 ·
статус complete · собран 2026-09-13T06:08:00+00:00 ·
сверено: строки сходятся с объявленным числом · показан более ранний доказанно полный снимок, новый #8421 (legacy_import) неполон
· ожидалось 143,
фактических строк 143, сохранено 143
экспертный allowlist: Expert Junior, Expert Senior, Specialist, Connoisseur.
Служебные роли (Administrator, Community Manager, Editor, Photo Moderator, Shoplink Moderator, Super Administrator) остаются ролью, но
экспертизой не объявляются. Авторское смещение не применяется:
author-bias correction not applied; view is raw observations.
показано 43 из 143
· страница 3 из 3 · за страницей ещё 100
Одно наблюдение = одна строка исходной таблицы;
повторные оценки одного автора сохраняются. «Дата неизвестна»
означает отсутствие даты в источнике, а не время сбора.